Friday 10 December 2010

How to help people to have good ideas

According to Albert Einstein, “The significant problems we have cannot be solved at the same level of thinking with which we created them”.  So, it seems that we need to think about solving problems in different ways.  Most people would agree that one of the key factors in successful problem-solving is the ability to generate good ideas.  Without a supply of good ideas organisations will stagnate or worse still, cease to exist.  So how can managers help people to have good ideas?
I recently had the privilege of facilitating a workshop for a group of professionals who had taken time-out from their day to day work activities to think about ways their service offering could be improved.
The scene was set, everyone had been briefed and the day got off to an enterprising start.  Part of the day was given over to trying out some creative thinking exercises as a way of generating new ideas.  It soon became apparent that a number of factors were getting in the way.  These factors were similar to ones which I had discovered when conducting my doctoral research into creative problem-solving.  The outcomes from my research found among the main inhibitors to creative thinking were physical environment, personal attitude to creativity and organisational culture.
Physical environment plays a key role in helping the mood, comfort and creative spark.  This is why some more forward thinking organisations set up ‘play’ areas where relaxed discussions can take place without the pressures of everyday work activities impacting.  For those who don’t have this type of luxury, it may just mean organising these discussions to happen away from the workplace; a trip to a coffee shop, a picnic in a park, a walk around a gallery or museum or somewhere inspiring.  The focus here is to make people feel relaxed and enjoy the novelty of a different environment.  You don’t need to sit around in an office with a flip chart and pen to brainstorm ideas. 
Personal attitude towards creativity is a barrier that unless overcome will just mean people will perpetuate the same old ways of thinking about problems.  Mostly people’s first reaction is to say they are not creative and think it is the reserve of those who engage in artistic acts such as painting, writing poetry or composing music.  What people fail to acknowledge is that we are all capable of having good ideas which is a key component of the creative process.  http://www.slideshare.net/betsystreeter/let-out-the-creative-beast  Managers, however, first need to put their own house in order, that is believe in their own creative talents and then nurture the talents of others.   This can be achieved by delegating interesting and challenging tasks.  The outcome of any delegated task needs to be clearly agreed but how that outcome is achieved is where creative opportunities present themselves. 
Lastly, organisational culture is in my opinion the biggest blocker to creative thinking.  At the macro level, organisations will espouse the values of creativity and innovation but in practice they discourage their very existence.  http://www.meettheboss.tv//articles/default.aspx?articleId=338  Risk and learning go hand-in-hand with creativity but for some organisations, particularly in the current climate, these very words are considered acts of treason.  At the micro level, managers have some responsibility for developing and contributing to their team’s culture.  So, how can managers ensure creativity is at the heart of their team’s culture? The good news is they don’t have to do this alone.  They can start by talking to their team members.  Involve them in agreeing what needs to happen and how.  Make time and space for creative thinking to happen.  Manage the parameters of risk-taking and most importantly if things don’t go the way they were intended, don’t blame, discourage or crush peoples’ self-confidence just make sure you all learn from any mistakes.   And lastly, relax, don’t try too hard, the creative spark cannot be turned on or off like a tap, if you think of it within the analogy of a theatre, creativity is one of the actors in a play who at times could be waiting in the wings, dancing in the chorus line or could be performing centre stage.  The manager’s role is that of theatre director, to encourage, inspire, support and be prepared to be amazed at what emerges.

Tuesday 19 October 2010

Phased leadership in the Sahara – a mirage or a fertile oasis?

Here at L7 we focus on helping organisations to develop their leadership talent. We believe  that leadership is relevant at all levels in organisations and the growing body of writing on shared and distributed leadership fits with our experiences  and value systems.
Reflecting upon a recent trip to Morocco my thinking about shared leadership has been evolving based on observations and perceptions of how the leadership role was not just shared but phased in order to best meet needs at different stages of the trip.  To an extent, this phased leadership reflected the planning process and the structures put in place by the organisers. However, it also drew upon less formal aspects of context and personal/team characteristics and needs.
I travelled to Morocco in order to undertake a sponsored Sahara desert trek in aid of CLIC Sargent. Those of us taking part came from the local business community and whilst some had more intrepid backgrounds than others, none of us had walked for three days across a desert before. In this respect we were totally dependent on the organisers and facilitators to ensure our success in achieving our goal and also in ensuring our well being throughout. We needed to be led and were willing (and excited!) followers at every stage of the project.
There were three key phases to our trip: 1. The pre trek period that  involved fund raising, getting fit and liaising with fellow trekkers for support:  2. The journey to and from the Sahara involving the logistics of getting to the right rendezvous points at the right times and observing safety rules and protocols;  3. The trek itself which involved daily planning of our route according to  weather and terrain conditions, knowledge of the local geography and culture,  the local languages, advising on local set up and support.
At each of these phases, the leadership role was undertaken by a different person. Whilst there was an element of dovetailing of leadership input, the roles were phased in terms of predominance according to the requirements of the situation. In the phase one pre trek period, our leader drew upon skills and experience of organising, communication and motivation. During the phase two journey to the desert, a designated trip manager joined us and brought her experience of the trekking process and the organising company rules and regulations. On our phase three arrival in Morocco, our local guide became our leader. Whilst the phase two leader maintained control over timings and overall scheduling, our phase three leader became responsible for the trekking arrangements and all of the logistics that supported our living arrangements during the trek.  Our phase one leader became ‘one of the trekkers’ although there were some periods in which she became a spokesperson when there were questions to be asked or issues to be addressed.  
So at each phase of our journey, a different leader took prominence. This was based on a number of factors including personal experience, knowledge and expertise. None of the leadership roles faded away entirely in any phase and it was mainly in perceived crisis situations when some signs of contested leadership roles emerged. These were minor skirmishes and resolution was driven by the need to retain motivation and team spirit in order to complete the task.
In a recent video clip (http://video.ft.com/v/62699257001/MIT-Sloan-Distributed-leadership) Professor Ancona of the MIT Sloan School of Management highlights many pertinent points in relation to distributed leadership including the value of collaboration and the need for multi- directional communication and alignment. These were evident in the Sahara in terms of the integration of leadership roles and the need for collaboration, regardless of phase, in order to achieve our goals. These are also central pillars of our Level 7 leadership development approach which is based upon both inter and intra organisational collaboration and communication.
Ulrich and Smallwood’s recent work on ‘Personal Leadership Brand’ is also worth looking at in this context (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vtjWXzajQXw). They identify the importance of distributed leadership advocating that leaders at all levels should focus upon building on strengths that deliver value. In the desert context, each leader in their own phase of the project did just that, applying specific skill sets to meet the need s of the team during that particular phase. At points in the trek when they were not the dominant leader, they were still able to contribute in situations where their own strengths could contribute to a successful outcome.
I would love to hear your thoughts about distributed leadership and the contribution that the concept of phased leadership could make to enhancing understanding.
My Saharan experience has given me so much food for thought not just in relation to my personal development but also in identifying parallels with issues of organisational development. As these thoughts unravel and evolve, I will be sharing more of them with you over the next few weeks and months.
Dorothy Foote
Director Level Seven (UK) Limited